Frequently Asked Questions

KeyOpinions produces structured case intelligence outputs — including a FIT score indicating case strength, a decision confidence percentage derived from similar cases, a case value signal, and flagged deviations from standard of care. These outputs are designed to help attorneys determine whether to pursue a case and which experts to engage, before committing significant time or capital.

KeyOpinions outputs are grounded in structured analysis of similar cases and clinical standards — not generative AI speculation. Each confidence signal is tied to a reference set of comparable matters, and the platform surfaces the reasoning behind every flag. Outputs are designed to support attorney judgment, not replace it.

No. KeyOpinions is a decision-support tool. It provides structured intelligence to inform attorney decision-making — it does not render legal advice, predict outcomes, or replace the professional judgment of a licensed attorney. All outputs should be independently evaluated by qualified legal counsel before being relied upon in any matter.

KeyOpinions is not a research tool or a case management system. It is a decision-support platform built specifically for early case evaluation. Rather than surfacing documents or tracking deadlines, it produces structured clinical and technical intelligence — viability signals, expert fit scores, and risk indicators — at the point of intake, when those decisions matter most.

KeyOpinions is designed to support a wide range of litigation matters, including medical malpractice, personal injury, product liability, professional liability, commercial disputes, and other expert-driven civil cases. The platform is not limited to predefined categories and can be applied to any matter where early case evaluation and expert insight are critical.

KeyOpinions is built for litigation practices that regularly handle complex civil matters and engage expert witnesses. This includes boutique plaintiff firms, mid-size litigation practices, and large firm litigation departments. The platform is most impactful where early case evaluation decisions carry significant financial and strategic weight.

Each case is evaluated against a structured expert database using a composite FIT score. The score accounts for specialty alignment, prior testimony history, publication record, jurisdictional experience, and case-type fit. Experts are ranked and surfaced at intake — replacing manual outreach and referral-based selection with case-specific, data-driven recommendations.

Yes. In addition to surfacing new expert recommendations, KeyOpinions allows you to run structured vetting on experts you've already identified — evaluating their profile against your specific case requirements, prior testimony patterns, and credibility signals relevant to your jurisdiction and claim type.

KeyOpinions is currently in limited early access for qualifying litigation practices. You can apply through the Request Early Access form on this page. We review all applications personally and prioritize firms where structured litigation intelligence will have the greatest impact.

No. Applying for early access is free and carries no commitment. We review all applications personally and will reach out to discuss fit, timeline, and pricing before any agreement is made.

We review all applications personally and typically respond within a few business days. If your practice is a strong fit, we'll schedule a brief conversation to understand your workflow and confirm access.