Key decisions need KeyOpinions.
Evaluate case viability, surface risk, and identify the right experts before you commit time and capital.
Make early litigation decisions with structured clinical and technical intelligence — not guesswork.
// 01 Problem
Decisions made
in the dark.
Attorneys are forced to make early case decisions without structured clinical or technical intelligence, leading to poor case selection, inefficient expert use, and delayed clarity at the moments that matter most.
The cost isn't just financial — it's strategic. Every case pursued without proper intelligence is capital and time committed without the full picture.
Case decisions made without sufficient insight
Attorneys commit to cases before understanding the underlying clinical or technical complexity — leading to wasted spend, poor outcomes, and costly surprises at trial.
Expert selection is reactive, not informed
Identifying the right expert witness is often a last-minute scramble driven by referrals rather than case-specific data — resulting in poor fit, delayed timelines, and unnecessary fees.
Weak cases pursued, strong cases passed over
Without structured case signals, firms take on matters that shouldn't proceed and decline those that should — eroding profitability and client trust.
// 02 Solution
Structured intelligence
at intake.
KeyOpinions is a decision-support platform that reduces uncertainty at the point of intake — combining case signals, expert intelligence, and pattern-based insights to give attorneys the clarity they need before committing time and capital.
Case Signals
Identify case strength and risk early in the evaluation process. Structured analysis surfaces clinical deviations, standard-of-care gaps, and precedent patterns — before you commit time or capital.
Expert Intelligence
Experts are matched to your case profile using fit scores that account for specialty alignment, prior testimony, and case-specific criteria — not referrals or guesswork.
Pattern-Based Insights
Outcomes from similar cases inform your decisions, helping you anticipate risk, assess case value, and know whether to move forward before committing resources.
“The right expert, identified at the right time, changes the trajectory of a case. KeyOpinions surfaces that clarity at intake — so you can decide with confidence before you've committed to anything.”
// 03 Workflow
From intake
to decision.
A structured five-stage process that transforms raw case information into clear, defensible litigation decisions — reducing uncertainty at every step.
Expert FIT Score
The most relevant experts are identified based on case patterns — ranked by specialty alignment, prior testimony, and case-specific fit criteria. No referrals. No guesswork.
Intake
Case details, claim type, and jurisdiction are structured at intake — establishing the intelligence baseline that drives every downstream decision.
Case Signals
Risk and viability indicators are surfaced immediately — clinical deviations, standard-of-care gaps, and precedent patterns scored against similar cases. Identify case strength before committing resources.
Expert FIT Score
The most relevant experts are identified based on case patterns — ranked by specialty alignment, prior testimony, and case-specific fit criteria. No referrals. No guesswork.
Expert Vetting
Shortlisted experts are evaluated through structured, case-specific profiles — covering publication history, prior testimony, and credibility signals that matter at trial.
Final Decision
A clear, actionable case assessment gives your team the confidence to pursue, decline, or restructure — with the intelligence to defend that decision from day one.
// 04 Platform
Every active case.
One clear view.
The KeyOpinions dashboard gives your team a live view of every case — FIT score, confidence rating, estimated value, and a clear pursue or pass recommendation — so nothing falls through the cracks.
Navigation
This Month
J. Harrison
Harrison & Assoc.
Case Dashboard
Harrison & Associates · April 2026
Active Cases
6
Pursue Rate
60%
Avg. Confidence
77%
Reports Ready
2
Robert Martinez
Medical Malpractice · California
FIT Score
Strong
Confidence
89%
Est. Value
$1.2M–$2.8M
Experts
4 matched
Decision Confidence
89%Based on comparable precedent cases in California
Signal Summary
7 total signals flagged
This is a live interactive demo
Click any case above, or explore all four platform screens — intake, analysis, expert matching, and report.
// 05 Capabilities
Built for the
way cases work.
Every capability in KeyOpinions is designed around the actual decision points attorneys face — not generic AI features retrofitted to legal workflows.
AI-powered case evaluation
Automated analysis of case intake data against a structured model of clinical, technical, and jurisdictional variables — producing a clear viability signal before any attorney time is committed.
Expert matching and fit scoring
Each case is matched against a curated expert database using a composite fit score — accounting for specialty alignment, prior testimony, publication record, and case-type history.
Structured expert insights database
A continuously updated repository of expert witness profiles, organized by specialty, jurisdiction, and litigation history — built for precision retrieval, not keyword search.
Litigation intelligence and pattern recognition
Cross-case pattern analysis surfaces trends in outcomes, expert performance, and jurisdictional behavior — giving your team a strategic edge grounded in real litigation data.
// 06 Impact
Reduction in wasted spend
Structured case signals help firms avoid committing time and capital to matters that don't meet viability thresholds — reducing expert fees and case costs before they accumulate.
Faster expert selection
High-confidence signals aligned with expert insight replace weeks of manual outreach and referral-chasing with case-specific, ranked recommendations available at intake.
Actionable signals at intake
Know whether to move forward before committing resources. Case intelligence is available from the moment a matter enters the platform — not weeks into evaluation.
Based on internal case evaluations and structured expert analysis workflows.
// Early Access
Make better case decisions
from day one.
Reduce uncertainty at the point of intake. Early access is limited to qualifying litigation practices — apply now to be among the first firms to use the platform.
No commitment required. We review all applications personally.